• advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • ×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

      Only 75 emoji are allowed.

    ×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

    ×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

    ×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • மனிதர்களாக இருந்து கொண்டு இந்திய பொலீசின் என்கவுண்டரை கொண்டாடுவது தான் கவலையானது.
    • No prison sentence for this coward? just a monetary penalty - absurd.   If this guy was a UK citizen and even if he did this to his spouse, he would got much severe punishment ( nothing wrong with that) .
    • மேலும் அம்பந்தொடை  பேரத்தின் விபரங்கள், சிங்களம் எப்படி சிறிது சிறிதாக கசியவிட்டது என்பதற்கு .  MoU ஐ தேடுகிறேன், கிடைத்தால் இணைத்து விடுகிறேன். http://docplayer.net/149924092-China-in-south-asia-south-asia-in-china-obor-and-the-sri-lankan-experience.html Sunday, July 30, 2017 http://www.sundaytimes.lk/170730/news/hambantota-port-deal-signed-minority-stake-for-slpa-in-both-new-companies-252696.html Hambantota port deal signed; minority stake for SLPA in both new companies The Concession Agreement for the controversial Rs. 193 billion Hambantota Port, the legally binding document for what is being promoted as a public-private partnership, was signed yesterday. The event at the Ports and Shipping Ministry was telecast live over the UNP-controlled state run Independent Television Network (ITN). Ministry Secretary L.P. Jayampathy and Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA) Chairman Parakrama Dissanayake signed on behalf of the Government while Vice Chairman Bai Jingtao signed for China Merchants Port Holdings Company Ltd. The highlight of the Agreement is the setting up of two separate companies – HIPG (Hambantota International Port Group (Pvt.) Ltd.),  which will oversee commercial operations and HIPS (Hambantota International Port Services (Pvt.) Ltd) to oversee Common User Facilities (CUF), including security operations. In the port operator company HIPG, CMPort (the Chinese company) will have a majority stake (85%) and the SLPA will have a minority stake (15%). The CUF Company – HIPS, the SLPA will have 42% and the HIPG 58% of the stake. Thus, the SLPA is a minority shareholder in both these companies. After last Tuesday’s Cabinet meeting where Minister Samarasinghe’s memorandum was approved, a news release was issued on Wednesday. Both the Minister’s memorandum and the news release create the understanding that the SLPA has the majority stakes in HIPS. It states the SLPA will have 50.7 percent of the shares and CMPort 49.3 percent. Corporate Analysts, however, pointed out, that the SLPA’s 50.7 per cent is made up of 8.7 percent stake in HIPS shares is not direct, but is represented through HIPG in a convoluted share-structure. The Agreement, which is a legally binding document, states that “initial equity share capital to be comprised of 42% to be held by the SLPA and 58% to be held by the HIPG operator.” The document signed yesterday does not mention SLPA’s 8.7 percent stake to be held separately in HIPS. Instead, it says the HIPG would hold 58% stake in HIPS. Analysts point out to the widely regarded commercial practice, in a corporate set up, that a majority shareholder decides the policies as well as controls the day-to-day decision making. The CMPort has a controlling stake in the HIPG, so all decisions of HIPG would be the decisions of the CMPort. The minority shareholding becomes irrelevant since they can be voted out. Among the ministers who attended yesterday’s ceremony were Malik Samarawickrema, Sarath Amunugama, Mangala Samaraweera and Mahinda Samarasinghe. China’s envoy Yi Xianliang was also present. Minister Samarasinghe claimed that further changes in the Agreement could be made even after yesterday’s signing. He said the document would now go before the Cabinet for endorsement and would be tabled in Parliament thereafter. Earlier, President Maithripala Sirisena had said that the Concession Agreement would be signed only after Parliament debated the deal. According to the news release issued by the Ministry of Ports and Shipping, the Hambantota Port which began commercial operations in November 2011 has an accumulated loss of Rs. 46.7 billion and that in from January this year it has handled only 10 ships if the car carriers which were forced to unload at the port instead of the Colombo Port are taken off. The land area that will be gazetted to be leased out to companies wanting to invest around the Hambantota Port will be 1,115 hectares (and not 1,574 hectares), adds the release. The release also states, “The sole responsibility and authority in relation to National Security is with the Government of Sri Lanka).   25 July 2017   http://www.sundaytimes.lk/article/1028344/hambantota-port-agreement-to-be-tabled-in-parliament-tomorrow "The Minister said the agreement was an improvement on the earlier agreement where the Chinese side would have got an 80 per cent stake in the port.   Under the new agreement, the SLPA's state would rise to 30 per cent while CMHC will hold 70 per cent. The agreement would see the setting up of two Sri Lankan companies to carry out operations of the port. They are the Hambantota International Port Services Co. (Pvt) Ltd (HIPS) and Hambantota International Port Group (Pvt) Ltd (HIPG). The SLPA will hold a share of 50.7% and CMHC 49.3% in HIPS while the share allocation of HIPG would be 85% to CMHC and 15% to SLPA. Accordingly all immovable and movable properties will be transferred to these companies.  The agreed investment value of the deal is USD 1.12 billion.  Under the new agreement, the sole responsibility and authority in terms of national security will be with the Sri Lankan Government,"   
    • யாரும் எனக்கு எப்போதும் யாரும் ஹீரோ இல்லை அண்ணர். மனிதர்களை மனிதர்களாக பார்க்கும் பாக்கியம் பெற்றவன் நான். செயற்கரியதை செய்யும் மனிதனை புகழும், அவர்களின் தனித்துவ குணவியல்புகளை சிலாகிக்கிக்கும் அதே நொடியில் அவர்களின் சறுக்கல்களை இனம்காணவும், விமர்சிக்கவும் முடிவது அதனால்தான். இந்த தெளிவு இல்லாத படியால்தான் உங்களுக்கு சீரோக்களை இனம்காணுவதில் பிரச்சினை வருகிறது.
    • Crisis of Aboriginal women in prison in Australia Aboriginal women are the largest cohort of prisoners in Australia, despite making up only 2 percent of the population. Ali MC2 Dec 2019 Vickie Roach says imprisonment disproportionately targets Aboriginal women, who are already disadvantaged in society [Sylvia Liber/Al Jazeera] Melbourne, Australia - Vickie Roach was 12 the first time she was imprisoned. Forty-eight years ago, in the early 1970s, she was arrested after running away from abusive foster homes and institutions. "The morning after you arrive, you have to go see the doctor. They would examine you to see if you were pregnant or had STDs. And if you weren't cooperative they would hold you down and do it," said Roach, now 60. For a young girl who had been sexually abused, this procedure was "traumatic". But her contact with the criminal justice system in Australia began even earlier - when she was two.  Then, she was removed from her mother as part of the Stolen Generations, an era when Aboriginal children were taken from their families in order to be raised by white people in foster homes and institutions. Under the law at the time, any child removed from their family first had to be charged with an offence. As such, many Aboriginal children like Roach had criminal records almost from birth. "Any contact with the criminal justice system pretty much ensures continued contact with them," she said. She has survived heroin addiction, domestic violence, sexual abuse and repeated stints in jail. Aboriginal women in Australia represent the largest cohort of prisoners in the country, comprising approximately 34 percent of the total number of female prisoners, despite making up only 2 percent of Australia's total population.  They also represent the fastest-growing prison population.  Since a Royal Commission aiming to reduce the number of imprisoned Aboriginal people was conducted in 1991, the population of Aboriginal women in prison has risen by 148 percent. About 80 percent of these women are mothers, most are on remand, and few have committed any serious crime. Instead, as Roach explained, drug addiction, homelessness, domestic violence, child removal and abuse are often the untreated social conditions that lead to incarceration. For many of these women, contact with the criminal justice system began at an early age, after being removed from their Aboriginal families and placed into the child welfare system.  "Being involved with the child welfare department, minor issues in a normal family would have been dealt with at home [by] mum and dad," Roach said. "But I'd often be fed into the child welfare system - they'd be the ones to discipline me." This would result in further criminal charges and a stint in juvenile detention. Yet the causes of her experience had begun the previous generation. Roach's mother had also been removed from her Aboriginal family and raised in an institution. "Mum didn't really know how to be a family because she had never been parented." After being taken from her mother, Roach would not see her again until she was 13, by which stage, "the connection was broken". At one point, Roach even lived in the same institution as her mother had the generation before. "Mum came to visit me [once] and it was the home that she was in. And I didn't know it was the home she was in. It was pretty shocking for her."  As a young adult, Roach spiralled into heroin use and prostitution and would become a victim of domestic violence. In prison, her problems grew. Naomi Murphy has also experienced the negative cycle of the criminal justice system. She accrued a minor criminal record as a young woman, including the charge of theft of a motor vehicle which she says was stolen by her then-boyfriend; Naomi simply happened to be riding in it. Yet despite getting herself on the right side of the law later in life, her criminal record would come back to haunt her, impacting her ability to get a job. "There's still things that sit on my record from 1992 - theft of a motor car and evading a train ticket," she told Al Jazeera. She now works for a community legal project called Woor-Dungin, which advocates to have criminal records of 10 years or more expunged so that Aboriginal people can move on with their lives. The project addresses one of the biggest barriers - employment. "Aboriginal women are the main carers of the children - if we can't get jobs how are we supposed to feed the kids?" Antoinette Braybrook, head of Djirra, a Melbourne-based organisation that works with Aboriginal women who have experienced family violence, said: "Most Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women inside are in for non-violent offences related to homelessness and poverty. "Laws around unpaid fines, public drunkenness, or unfair bail laws in Victoria, are known to disproportionately impact Aboriginal women. We advocate for the immediate abolition of those unfair laws." She said prisons are not safe spaces for Aboriginal women.  Ironically, however, a new wing recently built in Melbourne's maximum-security women's prison, has been named Winja Gunya, an indigenous phrase for "safe camp for women". Antoinette said: "The only safe space for our women is to be in their home, with their family and in their community, free from violence. It's by addressing underlying issues like family violence, poverty and homelessness that we are going to keep our women safe. Governments need to invest in specialist culturally safe services like Djirra, not expand prisons." 'Custody is one of the least safe places we can be' Aboriginal women are already severely disadvantaged in society. They are 32 timesmore likely than non-indigenous women to be hospitalised due to domestic violence, and one in four women seeking help for homelessness are Aboriginal.  Even today, Aboriginal children are 10 times more likely than non-Aboriginal children to be removed from their families and placed into child welfare, often due to mothers being in prison.  "They [government decision-makers] think the health care's good. They think the food is good. They think we are going to have a bed. That these things get us away from an abusive partner, and get us away from drugs. If we're homeless, that when we get arrested we are going to have a bed for the night," said Roach. "For Aboriginal women, being in custody is one of the least safe places we can be." Since her last stint in prison, which ended in 2008, Roach has gained a master’s degree and is now an advocate for Aboriginal women. Women, she said, should be supported instead of being thrown in jail. Yet, despite the recent custodial deaths of two Aboriginal women - Ms Dhu, who was imprisoned for unpaid fines, and Tanya Day,arrested while drunk on a train - activists do not expect the system to change. Governments across the country heavily investing in the prison system. A recent report demonstrated that the cost of imprisoning Indigenous people in Australia was eight billion Australian dollars ($5.5bn) a year, with this cost set to hit 20 billion Australian dollars ($13.8bn) a year by 2040, should the current rates of incarceration continue to increase. "We need to stop criminalising people and locking them up in places that dehumanises them," said Roach. "We are all demeaned and belittled by the way we treat people in prison."   https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/crisis-aboriginal-women-prison-australia-191105183142685.html