Sign in to follow this  
Rajesh

கொரோனா அச்சுறுத்தல் – திருக்கோணேஸ்வரர் ஆலய வருடாந்த திருவிழா ஒத்திவைப்பு

Recommended Posts

கொரோனா அச்சுறுத்தல் காரணமாக பஞ்ச ஈஸ்வரங்களில் பாடல் பெற்ற தலமான திருக்கோணேஸ்வரர் ஆலயத்தின் வருடாந்த திருவிழா ஒத்திவைக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

நாட்டில் நிலவுகின்ற அசாதாரண சூழலைக் கருத்திற்கொண்டு திருக்கோணேஸ்வரர் ஆலய பரிபாலன சபை இந்தத் தீர்மானத்தை எடுத்துள்ளது.

தேவார முதலிகளில் முதல்வரான திருஞானசம்பந்தரால் கோணமாமலை அமர்ந்தார் என போற்றிப் பாடப்பட்ட திருக்கோணேஸ்வரர் ஆலயம் வரலாற்று தொன்மைமிக்கதாகும்.

கிழக்கின் அடையாளச்சின்னமாக விளங்கும் இந்த பாரம்பரிய திருத்தலத்தின் வருடாந்த திருவிழா பங்குனி உத்தரமான எதிர்வரும் 6ஆம் திகதி கொடியேற்றத்துடன் ஆரம்பமாக இருந்தது.

எனினும்,கொரோனா தொற்று அச்சத்தால் மக்களின் நலன் கருதி திருவிழாவை இந்த வருடம் ஒத்திவைக்க நம்பிக்கை பொறுப்பாளர் கூட்டத்தில் உத்தேசிக்கப்பட்டது.

அதற்கான பிராயச்சித்தமாக சமயத்தலைவர்கள், பக்தர்களின் ஆலோசனையின் பிரகாரம் சம்புரோட்சண யாகம் நிறைவேற்ற தீர்மானிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளது.

http://athavannews.com/கொரோனா-அச்சுறுத்தல்-திர/

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • ஒரு பிள்ளைக்கு தாய்மொழியும் ஆங்கிலமும், இரண்டாவது மொழியும் அதாவது மூன்று மொழியும்.... கட்டாயம். நீங்கள் சொல்வது நாம் அங்கு வாழந்த காலம்.  சும்மா பீலா விட்டிருப்பார்கள். சர்வதேச பாடசாலைகளில் ஆங்கிலத்தில் படிப்பிக்கும் மோகம் இருந்தது. உள்நாட்டு பல்கலைக்கழக அனுமதி இல்லாமல், மேல்படிப்பிற்கு விசா பெறுவதில் நடைமுறை சிக்கல் உண்டாகி, இந்தியாவில் படிக்கும் நிலை வந்தபின், அந்த மவுசு குறைவு.
    • The Burning of Jaffna Public Library: Sri Lanka’s First Step Toward Civil War The events of 39 years ago set the stage for Sri Lanka’s civil war – and still echo today.  |  The reconstructed Jaffna Public Library. Credit: Wikimedia Commons/ Anton Croos It was May 31, 1981 when early signs of the looming civil war broke out on the Jaffna peninsula of northern Sri Lanka. An organized Sinhala mob carried out an arson attack on the prestigious Jaffna Public Library, at its time one of the largest and best equipped ones in South Asia.  This mob, however, was not an ignorant, anonymous group of frustrated vigilantes. They were a larger group of  a hundred officers of the Sri Lankan police force, who were taken to Jaffna by two senior Sri Lankan cabinet ministers, namely Cyril Mathew and Gamini Dissanayake, to observe and disrupt a rally organized by the Tamil United Liberation Front (TULF). At its height, the TULF was the most important political party representing the Tamil minority in the Sri Lankan parliament in Colombo. However, the rally went out of control amid the confrontation, resulting in the deaths of three police officers. In the aftermath, the Jaffna Public Library was set ablaze and the burning continued unchecked for two nights. But it didn’t halt there: fire and violence spread to many homes and shops across Jaffna, including the TULF headquarters and the office of the Ealanadunewspaper. Tamil cultural and religious figures were defaced and destroyed. Prominent politicians from the TULF — like my father, Vannai Ananthan — went into hiding as the Sri Lankan police targeted political opponents against the background of this orchestrated violence. Meanwhile, Matthews and Dissanayke watched the Jaffna Public Library burn from the veranda of the nearby Jaffna Rest House. Later on they claimed that the library burning was an “an unfortunate event, where [a] few policemen got drunk and went on a looting spree all on their own.” This narrative of lone looters and rioters became a constant justification in post-colonial Sri Lanka, echoed by Sinhala leaders and Sinhala media. Such language provided the ground for impunity. In 1933 — the same year when the Nazis burnt 25,000 volumes of “un-German” books in the square at the State Opera, Berlin — the Jaffna Public Library began as the private collection of the scholar K.M. Chellapha, who started to lend books from his home. This modest beginning resulted in a local committee, with Chellapha as the secretary, setting up a formal library. At the beginning, the small library held 1,000 books, newspapers, and journals in one small room; however the collection grew over time, and was eventually moved to a building on main street and opened to subscribers. Prominent members of the Jaffna community started to raise funds to build a permanent and modern building. From that moment, a greater group of people assembled to help build up the oasis of knowledge and collect the memories of the Tamils: the prominent architect V.M. Narasimman designed the new building, while the prominent Indian librarian S.R. Ranganathan served as an adviser to ensure that the library was meeting international standards. Distinguished members of the Tamil community donated books. The main building was opened in 1959 by the then-mayor of Jaffna, Alfred Duraippah, who was later assassinated in 1975 by the militant Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam. The Jaffna Library rose to prominence, as it was loved by international and domestic intellectuals, but most importantly it served as a cultural hub for the Tamil community. The library housed documents of invaluable worth, such as the only existing copy of the Yalpanam Vaipavama, a history of Jaffna written by Tamil poet Mayilvagana Pulavar in 1736. The library held miniature editions of the Hindu Ramayana epic, yellowing collections of extinct Tamil-language newspapers, microfilms of important documents, and records of the Morning Star, a journal published by Christian missionaries during the colonial rule of the island. Moreover, it housed close to 100,000 Tamil books and rare, old manuscripts and documents. Some of the precious documents were written on dried palm leaves and stored in fragrant sandalwood boxes. Documents in the library included historical scrolls on herbal medicine and the manuscripts of prominent intellectuals, writers, and dramatists – and they wound up in ashes. Enjoying this article? Click here to subscribe for full access. Just $5 a month. As Sinhala librarian and bibliographer H.A.I Goonetileke wrote in an emotional private letter, “The gutted building is a grim testimonial to savage and bestial tendencies of communal hate.” After the arson attack the leader of the TULF and Leader of the Opposition, Mr. Amirthalingam (who later also fell victim to assassination by the LTTE), issued a scathing speech in the Sri Lankan Parliament, nothing that “some very rare books (…) were all completely burnt. And curiously, Sir, this is an indication of the depths to which people in this country can sink.” The attack on the Jaffna Public Library was never properly investigated and the perpetrators were never held to account, adding another episode of impunity in the country. The Jaffna Public Library was the intellectual reservoir of a Tamil nation that had not been born, but was yearning to be. Targeting knowledge, history, and memory is a key feature in ethnic cleansing, as the attack on the Oriental Institute in 1992 in Sarajevo by Serbian nationalists evidenced. Thus the burning of the Jaffna Public Library was not a simple arson attack. It was a ferocious harbinger of the coming devastating war, which started in 1983 with the so-called Black July and ended in May 2009, resulting in approximately 200,000 deaths and what is still the second highest number of enforced disappearances in the world. But above that, the burning had another message: that those who hold power will and can erase identity whenever they want. The library burning was an attempt to rob the Tamil community of pride and dignity. It aimed at wiping out their heritage. In recent times, the Jaffna Public Library was reconstructed with the good will of donors and governmental efforts as a bid to win the support of the Tamils. Today, the library stands again, reconstructed after the disastrous burning and the vicious civil war. With or without the precious documents, it is an affirmation of Tamil heritage and resilience. Dr. Thamil Venthan Ananthavinayagan, is a Lecturer in International Law at Griffith College. He received his LL.M. from Maastricht University and his Ph.D. from NUI Galway
    • Sri Lanka's COVID-19 Response Is Proof That Demonisation of Minorities Has Been Normalised The health crisis has been used to reinforce the narrative that the ‘careless and undisciplined’ Muslim community has flouted social distancing and curfew laws. Harini Amarasuriya A labourer sits on a cart in a street with closed shops near the main market in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Photo: REUTERS/Dinuka Liyanawatte/ The response to the COVID-19 pandemic is highlighting inequalities, discrimination and marginalisation in societies everywhere as well as inadequacies of existing political and economic structures and cultures. We may all be equally susceptible to the virus, but our experience of it is most certainly not the same. In every society, groups that have borne the brunt of the virus are migrants, minorities, women, older people and those engaged in precarious jobs. In Sri Lanka too, the impact of the virus is being felt in all too familiar ways – reflecting the fault lines the country has been dealing with for the past several decades. Post-independence Sri Lanka has been marked by the struggles between a majority community often described as a ‘majority with a minority complex’, and minority communities faced with reduced influence and marginalisation in the face of majority rule. This manifested in a 30-year war with the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), fighting for a separate homeland for the Tamil community, which was brought to a bloody end in 2009. But the military defeat of the LTTE has not eased ethno-religious tensions in Sri Lanka by any means. It seems as if nurturing constant tension with an ethnic/religious ‘other’ is essential for doing politics in Sri Lanka. So, since 2009, there has been a rise in Islamophobia – one that is carefully nurtured, sustained and facilitated. It would not be an exaggeration to say that no event of ethnic or religious violence in Sri Lanka has taken place without the complicity of the political party in power – at the very least, by turning a blind eye or delaying taking action. Fanning anti-Muslim sentiments are wild rumours and ideas about ‘the Muslim community’.  One supposed characteristic of the Muslim community is their apparent disdain for law. The Muslim community, as believed by the majority Sinhalese and even the minority Tamil community, only respect ‘Muslim’ law. Therefore, they apply their own laws to their community and openly flout laws that apply to the rest of the country. More in :  Also Read: A Year After Easter Bombings, Sri Lanka Is Facing A Different Kind of Crisis For instance, they do not wear protective helmets when riding motorcycles as required by law and they have different laws when it comes to marriage and family. The latter, refers to personal laws which exist in Sri Lanka that are different from the General Law. The Muslim community is not the only community to have personal laws that differ from the General Law – there are personal laws that are specific to Tamils in the North of the country and Sinhalese from the district of Kandy, in the central province. Yet, Muslim personal laws relating to marriage and divorce, where for instance, the minimum age of marriage applicable to other communities does not apply, are taken as indications of the general disregard for the law among the Muslim community. The fact that there have been calls for reform of these personal laws, to bring them more in line with international and national human rights standards from within the community, especially Muslim women’s groups, for many decades, only to have these initiatives blocked at the highest levels of government, is largely disregarded. A member of the Civil Defence Force keeps watch outside Negombo Grand Mosque, following a string of suicide attacks on churches and luxury hotels, in Negombo, Sri Lanka, April 25, 2019. Photo: Reuters Response to the COVID-19 crisis When social distancing and curfew was imposed in response to COVID-19, there was a concerted effort by the government of Sri Lanka and media supportive of the government to suggest that the infection was well controlled in Sri Lanka – but for ‘rogue’ elements, who through their carelessness were spreading the virus and impeding government efforts at containing the virus. Initially, the ‘rogue’, ‘undisciplined’ elements were migrant Sri Lankans returning home from various parts of the world – who escaped or avoided quarantine. Very soon, attention turned to the Muslim community. In the daily reporting on COVID-19 infections, rates of infection among Muslim communities, or locations known to be majority Muslim areas, were specifically mentioned. The tracing of contacts of infected persons was accompanied by not just security forces entrusted with the task but media, especially when it came to such incidents among Muslim communities. Ultimately, protests from various groups resulted in the Ministry of Health issuing guidelines to the media on reporting on COVID-19, prohibiting mentioning the ethnicity/religion of infected people. However, till a cluster of infections were discovered in a Navy camp, shifting attention away from the Muslim community, the notion that infections were rife among Muslims was the prevailing view. The already established idea that the Muslim community does not respect laws of the land, reinforced the view of ‘careless and undisciplined’ Muslims flouting social distancing and curfew laws. There were rumours of gatherings in mosques in violation of curfew regulations; overcrowded living conditions attributed to Muslim-ness rather than poverty, and disregard for social distancing rules due to ‘cultural’ reasons. The idea that Muslims must be brought in line and not allowed to ‘do their own thing’ has been gaining force in society for a long time and simply intensified with COVID-19. Issue of compulsory cremation The extremely discriminatory funeral regulations that are in place in Sri Lanka – insisting on cremation of all those who die of COVID-19 – are an extension of this same line of thinking. Appeals by the Muslim community (and others) to adhere to international guidelines when it comes to funerals and to allow for burials with certain restrictions became seen as yet another instance of Muslims wanting ‘special’ treatment. The fact that Christians also traditionally bury rather than cremate and may be equally affected by these regulations were not considered. This too, became a stand-off with the Muslim community and an opportunity to put the Muslims in their place. Also Read: COVID-19 Data in South Asia Shows India is Doing Worse than Its Neighbours A leaked conversation between a moderator of a talk show and his panel (which included a government minister as well as representatives from the opposition parties), between takes, from a pro-government television station, revealed this attitude all too crudely. The discussion that was leaked suggests that the whole point of insisting on cremation is to teach the Muslim community that they must follow rules – that they cannot have their own way.  Enforcing cremation was articulated as an opportunity too good to be missed to teach the Muslim community a lesson. People maintain social distance in Colombo to buy groceries. Photo: Reuters/Dinuka Liyanawatte It is clear that stirring up anti-Muslim sentiments (or any kind of anti-minority sentiments) is a tried and tested political strategy in Sri Lanka—one which the current government has used very effectively in the past and is gearing up to use again in light of upcoming parliamentary elections. What is also evident is how these sentiments have now become normalised. The idea that Muslims are constantly seeking to impose their ideas on the rest of society, bend rules to their convenience and flout laws that they don’t like is now established in society. Behind recent campaigns calling for ‘one country, one law’ was also the need to bring the Muslim community to heel. Most calls for ‘unity’, a ‘Sri Lankan identity’, also reflect the majority preoccupation of ‘taming’ the minorities and bringing them under the benevolent control of the majority community. Many Sinhalese who would consider themselves cosmopolitan, democratic and tolerant, would not see the implicit exclusions and violence, in enforcing a totalising identity in a society such as Sri Lanka. COVID-19 and its impact on the Muslim community show the extent to which a majoritarian mindset that is comfortable with demonising minority communities – or any other community that is seen as a threat to the majority community – has become normalised in Sri Lankan society and polity. Harini Amarasuriya is a senior lecturer at the Open University of Sri Lanka.
    • அவர் மதிப்பீடு குழுவில் தானே உள்ளார் சோ அவர், துணைவேந்தர் ஆக முடியாது என நினைச்சன்.  அவரே தன்னை மதிப்பீடு செய்ய முடியாதல்லவா?