யார் இந்த ராதிகா குமாரசாமி?

சிறீ லங்கா அரசாங்கத்தின் கைக்கூலியாக சென்று 2006 ஏப்ரல் முதல் ஐக்கிய நாடுகள் சபையில் பணிபுரியும் இந்த ராதிகா குமாரசாமி என்பவர் யார்? அண்மையில் விடுதலைப் புலிகளிற்கெதிராக பொருளாதாரத் தடைகள் விதிக்கப்படவேண்டும் என முழக்கம் இட்டுள்ள அம்மணிக்கு சிறீ லங்கா அரசாங்கத்தினால் கொடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ள வேலைத் திட்டங்கள் எவை? இவர் ஒரு தமிழரா? அல்லது தமிழச்சி போல் வேடமிட்டுள்ள ஒரு சிங்களவரா? அம்மணியால் தமிழில் உரையாட முடியமா? இவருக்கு சமாதானத்திற்கான நோபல் பரிசு 2007 ம் ஆண்டில் கிடைப்பதற்கு வாய்ப்பிருக்கின்றதா? லக்ஸ்மன் கதிர்காமருக்கு பெண்வேடமிட்டது போல் முகச்சாயல் கொண்டுள்ள இவருக்கும் கதிர்காமரிற்கும் உள்ள தொடர்பு என்ன?

யாழ் கள நண்பர்களே அம்மணி பற்றி உங்களிற்குத் தெரிந்த விடயங்களை இங்கே பகிர்ந்து ராதிகா குமாரசாமியின் உண்மை முகத்தைக் கண்டறிவதற்கு உதவிபுரியுங்கள்!

Edited February 11, 200718 yr by மாப்பிளை

ஐ.நா இணையத்தளம் ராதிகா குமாரசாமிக்கு இவ்வாறு மகுடம் சூட்டி மகிழ்கின்றது:

Radhika Coomaraswamy - Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict

Radhika Coomaraswamy was appointed by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan as Under-Secretary-General, Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict in April 2006. In this capacity, she serves as a moral voice and independent advocate to build awareness and give prominence to the rights and protection of boys and girls affected by armed conflict.

Ms. Coomaraswamy, a lawyer by training and formerly the Chairperson of the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission, is an internationally known human rights advocate who has done outstanding work as Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women (1994-2003). In her reports to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, she has written on violence in the family, violence in the community, violence against women during armed conflict and the problem of international trafficking. A strong advocate on women’s rights, she has intervened on behalf of countless women throughout the world seeking clarification from Governments in cases involving violence against women.

Ms. Coomaraswamy was appointed Chairperson of the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission in May 2003. She has served as a member of the Global Faculty of the New York University School of Law. She has published widely, including two books on constitutional law and numerous articles on ethnic studies and the status of women.

Ms. Coomaraswamy has won many awards. These include: The International Law Award of the American Bar association, the Human Rights Award of the International Human Rights Law Group, the Bruno Kreisky Award of 2000, the Leo Ettinger Human Rights Prize of the University of Oslo, Cesar Romero Award of the University of Dayton, the William J. Butler Award from the University of Cincinnati, and the Robert S. Litvack Award from McGill University. In November 2005, in recognition of her service to the country and the world, the President of Sri Lanka conferred on her the title of “Deshamanya”.

Ms. Coomaraswamy is a graduate of the United Nations International School in New York. She received her B.A. from Yale University, her J.D. from Columbia University, an LLM from Harvard University and honorary PhDs from Amherst College, the University of Edinburgh and the University of Essex.

ஐ.நா வின் ராதிகா குமாரசாமி பற்றிய தகவலைப் பார்வையிட இங்கே அழுத்தவும்

ஓய் கு.சா ஆரிது?

சொல்லவே இல்லையே...

இவளுக்கு தமிழ்ப் பெண்களைப்பற்றி என்ன தெரியும்?

பெண்போராளிகளை இழிவுபடுத்தியவள்.

கைக்கூலி கொழும்புப்பகுதியிலேயே வளர்ந்த மேல்த்தட்டு வர்க்கம்.

இனவாதம் குதறும் எங்கள் பெண்களின் குரல் வெளியே வராமல் இருப்பதற்காக அமர்த்தப்பட்ட சிங்களத்தின் கைக்கூலி. ஐ.நா கௌரவம் என்பது தமிழருக்கு எதிராக தகவல் கொடுக்கும் அனைவருக்கும் கிடைக்கும். அது ஒன்றும் புதினம் இல்லையே.

யாழ் கள நண்பர்கள் கண்டு இரசிக்க இணையத்தில் மேலதிகமாக சுட்ட அம்மணியின் அழகுக் கோலங்கள்:

Edited February 11, 200718 yr by மாப்பிளை

சிங்கள இனவாதிகளின் ஆங்கிலப் பத்திரியான சன்டே ஒப்வ்சேவர் அண்மையில் அம்மணி சிறீ லங்காவிற்கு விசுவாசமாகச் செய்யும் சேவைகளைப் பற்றி இவ்வாறு கூறுகிறது:

Radhika and Rock call for sanctions against Tigers

The Special Representative of the Secretary General on Children and Armed Conflict Dr. Radhika Coomaraswamy and Ambassador Allan Rock have appealed to the UN Security Council's Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict to impose targeted sanctions against the LTTE.

The Security Council's Working Group on Children and Armed Conflict met on Friday to consider the reports of the Secretary General on children and armed conflict in Sri Lanka.

Ambassador Allan Rock who submitted, to the Working Group, a report on the findings of his fact-finding tour of the island last year, also highlighted according to Unicef estimates, the LTTE have recruited 18,000 children as child combatants since 2001.

He also expressed regret that the LTTE leadership had not honoured a commitment given to him to cease child recruitment by January 1 this year.

Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Prasad Kariyawasam who headed the Sri Lankan delegation to the Working Group stressed that the continuing child recruitment by the LTTE is contrary to its own commitments.

Recalling the LTTE's failure to implement the public undertaking given to Olara Otunnu nine years ago and the Action Plan entered into in 2003 with the Unicef to release children in its ranks, Ambassador Kariyawasam welcomed the report, which identified the LTTE as a repeated offender.

He urged the Working Group to heed to the call of the Secretary- General and recommend to the Security Council to adopt targeted measures against the LTTE.

Responding to alleged abductions and recruitment of children by the Karuna Faction, he emphasized that the Karuna Faction was working with the office of the Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict and as well as Unicef, the UN Children Agency.

He said the Government condemned alleged abduction and recruitment of children by the Karuna Faction, adding that it would investigate the allegations.

The Government delegation also denied the allegation that the security forces were directly or indirectly involved in child abductions carried out by the Karuna Faction.

The Government delegation stated that those allegations were based on superficial and unverified hearsay material, adding that it could be unsafe for the Working Group of the Security Council to act on such unreliable material. It stressed that the Government had decided to adopt necessary measures to ensure an independent and credible investigation into these allegations.

அம்மணியை பற்றி இணையத்தில் சுட்ட ஒரு ஆங்கிலக் கட்டுரை:

SANGAM.ORG

Ilankai Tamil Sangam, USA, Inc.

Association of Tamils of Sri Lanka in the USA

The Strengths and Weaknesses of Madam Radhika Coomaraswamy

by Sachi Sri Kantha

What percent of her time between 1994 and 2003 did Ms. Coomaraswamy use to travel, investigate and report on the human rights concerns of Tamil women living in the NorthEastern regions of Sri Lanka, who faced the brunt of state-sponsored terrorism (aerial bombing included) of the Sri Lankan armed forces?

Madam Radhika Coomaraswamy has been very much in the news lately. A month ago, an announcement was made by Kofi Annan, the High Pope of the UN, that he has appointed "Radhika Coomaraswamy of Sri Lanka as his Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict." Before I annotate the strengths and weaknesses of Madam Coomaraswamy, first I reproduce the media news release dated Feb.7th 2006, and distributed by the UN's Department of Public Information, News and Media Division, New York, under the imprimatur of the Secretary General [sG/A/979; BIO/3738; HR/4884]. I would like to peg my comments to the biographical details presented in this media release:

"UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan today announced the appointment of Radhika Coomaraswamy of Sri Lanka as his Special Representative for Children and Armed Conflict.

Ms.Coomaraswamy, a lawyer by training and currently Chairperson of the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission, is an internationally known human rights advocate who has done outstanding work as Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women (1994-2003). In her reports to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights, she has written on violence in the family, violence in the community, violence against women during armed conflict and the problem of international trafficking. A strong advocate on women's rights, she has intervened on behalf of countless women throughout the world seeking clarification from Governments in cases involving violence against women.

Ms.Coomaraswamy was appointed Chairperson of the Sri Lanka Human Rights Commission in May 2003. She is also the Director of the International Centre for Ethnic Studies in Colombo. She is a member of the Global Faculty of the New York University School of Law and teaches a summer course at New College Oxford University every July. She has published widely, including two books on constitutional law and numerous articles on ethnic studies and the status of women.

Ms.Coomaraswamy has won many awards. These include: The International Law Award of the American Bar Association, the Human Rights Award of the International Human Rights Law Group, the Bruno Kreisky Award of 2000, the Leo Ettinger Human Rights Prize of the University of Oslo, Cesar Romero Award of the University of Dayton, the William J.Butler Award from the University of Cincinnati, and the Robert S.Litvack Award from McGill University. In November 2005, in recognition of her service to the country and the world, the President of Sri Lanka conferred on her the title of 'Deshamanya'. She is the only woman to have received such a title.

Ms.Coomaraswamy is a graduate of the United Nations International School in New York. She received her B.A. from Yale University, her J.D. from Columbia University, an LLM from Harvard University and honorary PhDs from Amherst College, the University of Edinburgh and the University of Essex."

Huh! there is a specific mention about Madam Coomaraswamy receiving the 'Deshamanya' recognition from the then President of Sri Lanka for her "service to the country and the world" - a first among Sri Lankan women. What has been her "service to the country and the world"? According the High Pope of the UN, Madam Coomaraswamy, "in her reports to the United Nations Commission on Human Rights," has "written on violence in the family, violence in the community, violence against women."

These issues are as old as the Holy Bible and other holy religious texts. So, Madam Coomaraswamy cannot claim undue credit for raising awareness of issues which have been with human kind for millenia, other than in the rarified strata of the UN. Arguably, her "reports to the UN Commission on Human Rights" on these issues should come a distant tenth in raising awareness on these issues, when considering the fact that millions of pious Christians read the Holy Bible daily, and are constantly reminded of violence in the family, violence in the community and violence against women. Herein lie the strengths of Radhika Coomaraswamy.

The Strengths

Ms.Coomaraswamy has demonstrated four skills which I consider her strengths; the charm of a Hollywood starlet in the now vanished studio-era; the polish of a Harvard-educated academic; the self-promotion skills of a politician, and the guile of a Beverly Hills ambulance chaser. As a fellow Tamil, one can tolerate the first two skills of Ms.Coomaraswamy. But, it is her demonstration of the next two skills [that of a politician and an ambulance chaser] which pinches on my nerves.

Weaknesses

Ms.Coomaraswamy also has a few real or apparent weaknesses. One is her weakness for numbers. Just read her profile, presented by the High Pope of the UN. No mention is made about her birth year or age. This is what I call the coquetish charm of a Hollywood starlet. But, why is no mention made about the years in which she received her B.A, J.D. and LLM degrees from the American universities? There is another sentence in this profile which attracted my attention. "A strong advocate on women's rights, she has intervened on behalf of countless women throughout the world.". Countless?? - Is this some hyperbole? Or is that the UN bureaucracy has emaciated its accounting section?

Yet another sentence in Ms.Coomaraswamy's profile mentions that she has done "outstanding work as Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women (1994-2003)." Splendid. What percent of her time between 1994 and 2003 did Ms. Coomaraswamy use to travel, investigate and report on the human rights concerns of Tamil women living in the NorthEastern regions of Sri Lanka, who faced the brunt of state-sponsored terrorism (aerial bombing included) of the Sri Lankan armed forces? After all, as per the citation for her Deshamanya award presented by former President Chandrika, Ms Coomaraswamy should have served Sri Lankans of all shades.

The second real or apparent weakness of Madam Coomaraswamy is in her historical knowledge, or lack thereof. Arguably, she is one of the most literate Tamil women in Sri Lanka. But, intelligence is not in her veins. As her profile shows, Radhika never earned a university degree from Sri Lanka. This shows up in her deficiencies in comprehending the origin and growth of the Tamil militant movement in the second half of the 1970s. Madam Coomarawamy's earned university degrees were from top-notch American universities - Yale, Columbia and Harvard. One cannot feel jealous about this, since she was born with a silver spoon in her mouth, with her father Raju Coomarawamy serving in high diplomatic posts as a Ceylon representative in the 1950s and 1960s.

Fine, if this is so, then Radhika should have studied American revolutionary history and the role of American Patriots in the 1770s. Has Madam Coomaraswamy bothered to mention in any of her prolific writings or in her numerous visits to the lecture podiums, how independence was achieved by Washington and his gang from the oppression of King George III? And has she bothered to think how the LTTE's deeds compare favorably with what Washington's rag-tag army achieved in the New England territories of colonial America? If Ms.Coomaraswamy has indeed studied American revolutionary history and intentionally ignores comparison of the deeds of the American militia to the LTTE, it merely highlights her social-climbing skills to curry favor among the Sinhalese ruling elite.

What is the unmentioned goal of Radhika?

Simply said, the unmentioned goal of Radhika is nothing but a future invitation from Oslo for a Nobel Peace Prize. This explains her continued self-serving hosanna to non-violence and simultaneous bad mouthing of the LTTE's deeds from podiums and to the media. Cartoonist Bill Watterson has caricatured this 'Nobel prize' mania among elitists via his alter ego, the lovable rascal Calvin, in eight panels. I'll let Bill Watterson say the last word, from the episode where Calvin delights himself in bone-hunting with his pet, Hobbes the Tiger.

Edited February 11, 200718 yr by மாப்பிளை

தமிழரை கொச்சைப்படுத்தி துவேசமாகப் பேசுவதிலும் அம்மணி ஆற்றல்மிக்கவர் என கீழுள்ள கட்டுரை கூறுகின்றது:

Radhika Coomaraswamy and McGill University Must be Sued for Hate Speech

by Raveen Satkurunathan SANGAM.ORG

[Dr. Radhika Coomaraswamy is the head of the Sri Lankan Human Rights Commission and received a human rights award in Canada on November 8, 2005. The speech can be viewed at SriLankaDailyNews

For starters let's read the following: "The [Jewish] community appears to have lost its moral anchor, where violence, brutality and ruthlessness are explained and justified. People often take pride in how their community is represented both nationally and internationally. The [Jewish] community once represented as hard working, cultured and non violent, is now represented as a community living close to criminality, informed by thuggery, feeding the international underworld of crime and being comfortable with the forces of terror."

Or try this, replace the word Jewish with Black and see how far any charlatan who utters this statement can get before being sued by B'nai B'rith, the American Civil Liberties Union or Rev Jesse Jackson, let alone given an award.

But replacing Jewish with Sri Lankan Tamil elicits no murmur of protest from any civil liberties organization. It elicits only individual reactions from members of this maligned community. In this modern liberal world, stereotypical views of race, class and genderare relegated to the personal domain, not the public domain.

Public figures who hold such despicable views, such as Rev Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam, can say hateful things about the Jewish or white community in the US and get way with it, because of the US constitutional protection of freedom of speech, although they are the subject of public ridicule.

In Canada, however, such speech is considered hate speech and is not constitutionally protected and rightfully so. In Germany, also, no one can deny the holocaust or imply that Jews are an impure race. They can be put in prison for such speech.

As noted, both in North America and Europe, there are restrictions on public speech as far as hateful messages are concerned. What Radhika said publicly about the Sri Lankan Tamil Diaspora in the West at McGill should and must be considered as hateful and slanderous. Every effort should be made to identify what legal avenues are available in Canada under its hate speech regulations to sue both her and McGill University.

Is it an indication that McGill University also holds such views that it did not notice such a hateful and slanderous statement about a group of Canadian citizens by one of its award recipients of awards? At the very least, McGill University management should be forced to acknowledge this deviance from accepted Canadian values and apologize to fellow affected Canadians.

In fact Coomaraswamy's view is the same intolerant, bigoted message that is propagated by the Sinhala supremacists and fascists in numerous newspapers, TV shows and websites owned by them. It is a message that even the current Sri Lankan government, composed of such supremacists and fascists, cannot and will not say officially.

The implication of the Sri Lankan civil war and the contributions to the belligerents on both sides by some people of Sri Lankan descent living in the West has no bearing on what Coomaraswamy said. For people to migrate, there are always pull and a push factors. Without that pull no person of Sri Lankan Tamil decent would have ended up in the West, civil war or not. There are countless civil wars throughout the world at any given time. Millions of people are displaced and thousands more die on a daily basis because of these man-made catastrophes. But not all of them end up in the West. How many Dinkas from Sudan are living in the West? How many Moros from the Philippines are living in the West? They are all prosecuted minorities in their respective countries whose brethren took up arms to protest their treatment.

It is the unique colonial, historic and cultural conditions that contributed to the people of Sri Lankan Tamil descent migrating to the West; the civil war just hastened this migration. A good analogy would be the Scotch Irish, Russian German, South East Asian Chinese and European Jews in North America. Just like them, Sri Lankan Tamils also were seen as immigrants in their own country. Once a Tamil-speaking person left his or her native village to seek sustenance, as it was the historic necessity for that person to do so, he/she was in alien land, usually unwelcome and living in a ghetto even within Sri Lanka. So for that person to seek greener pastures further afield is not an unwelcome thought. We can conclude that Tamils from Sri Lanka have been historically and culturally predisposed and predestined to migrate, civil war or not.

For Radhika to see this Diaspora only through the prism of the civil war is an indication of her limited intellectual capacity and reasoning power. For her to believe, further, that this Diaspora is in fact clinging to its identity as a Sri Lankan, Tamil or even Sri Lankan Tamil is amazing considering her own admission as a cosmopolitan.

For most of us Tamil Canadians, or for those who consider ourselves as Tamil Canadians, the daily grind of life is of paramount importance. A great many of us have joined the throngs of the Canadian middle class aspiring even better options for our children. The drab apartment blocks of Scarborough and other towns, where relatively recent poor immigrant Tamils initially congregated are slowly getting populated by even newer immigrants from China and Eastern Europe. This is the great churning effect of urban Canada. One community moves in and other moves out to sSuburbia. First it was the Anglos, then the Greeks and Italians, then the Punjabis and now the Tamils are moving out in throngs to the greater suburbia of Markham, Vaughan and Brampton around Toronto. Living in the West, especially in Canada, stipulates either you join the rat race and progress through the food chain or fall aside and be marginalized.

Fortunately the cultural and historic factors which propelled these Tamils to leave their home country also prepared them to succeed in this harsh world. A great many of them have got off the government dole and have become tax-paying workers, home owners, small business owners and professionals in multitudes. They have steadfastly filled all niches available to them. Recently the author happened to see a TV interview on CBC with a young attractive female Tamil Canadian, who is a national forest ranger who works in Nunavut in the Arctic North!! Criminal activity, both the blue color variety and white, as with in other communities such as the mainstream and the hyphenated variety, is negligible compared to the published murders, robbery and rapes reported in Canada.

Unfortunately the preponderance of African Canadian youth in gun related deaths in Canada is putting a great strain on the entire country, which tries not to criminalize an entire community the way Radhika has done at McGill. The local police, politicians and bureaucrats dealing with this unfortunate situation are devising ever imaginative ways to deal, as well as communicate, about this situation without portraying the entire African Canadian community as prone to crime and thuggary. This sensitivity in the face of actual data, compared with what Radhika uttered without an iota of evidence in Montreal, is commendable indeed and makes me feel a proud Canadian.

Canadian Tamils who are interested in the events of their country of origin are comparable to any other hyphenated Canadians such as Jewish and Irish. It is not the only issue of concern for Canadian Tamils. I can say that for most middle class Canadians paying one's own mortgage bills and planning for their children's higher education is of more concern than any other issue around the world. Once these basic needs are fulfilled, Canadians in general are known to contribute to causes, whether that is approved by a Harvard educated elite or not.

Many Canadians contributed and kept the cause of East Timor alive when Xanana Gusmao's followers were essentially leading an armed insurrection against the Indonesians. The repercussions to East Timorese during the civil war were as stark as to the Tamils in Sri Lanka.

There are many Canadians who hold the idea of an independent Tibet very dear to them. Not all of them are Tibetan Canadians. Identity is also going through its sociological route, with some Tamils viewing themselves as Tamil Canadians, whereas others view themselves simply as visible minorities within Canada, finding common cause with Chinese or African Canadians. Yet others see themselves as just Canadians. Many of them are comfortable with different identities, such as a Hindu when at a Temple, Tamil in a Ceremony, visible minority in the workplace and as a Canadian in the world.

Although Canada as a society has done its best to eliminate racism and prejudice towards its visible and non visible minorities, racism is still a factor that holds some of us back. Racism affects how much money we make, how far you progress in promotions and what business loans we get. It effects our bottom line on a daily basis. It is a harsh reality for all visible minorities to face. Stereotypes and association with crime where none exists is just one of the prejudices that some mainstream Canadian have towards their visible minorities.

For a Sri Lankan of some "stature" to come to Canada and make such derogatory, hateful and factually wrong statements about a group of hardworking Canadians in a Canadian university of repute that we contribute to with our own tax money is unacceptable and unpardonable. We have to act to assure that such racist and hateful remarks cannot be made without strong protest and repercussions. It is time that some of us Tamil Canadians model ourselves around what the Anti Defamation League of the Jewish minority has done for that community.

When no one protests and protects us from such public insult, it is we who need to stand up and put these prejudiced Sri Lankans where they belong. They and their opinions belong in the racist, fascist and wretched Sri Lanka that we have left behind for good.

அம்மணிக்கு ஒரு மானமுள்ள தமிழனால் எழுதப்பட்ட அறிவுரை:

SANGAM.ORG

Ilankai Tamil Sangam, USA, Inc.

Association of Tamils of Sri Lanka in the USA

Response to Coomaraswamy

by Prof. P. Ramasamy, Malaysia, February 11, 2006

After having read Radhika Coomaraswamy's speech at McGill last year and her recent reply to the criticisms in the Ilankai Tamil Sangam, I am surprised by some of her remarks against the Tamil community. I would like to raise a few issues.

First, I think Coomaraswamy tends to be a bit biased in her analysis of the cause of the conflict in Sri Lanka. She has tried to shift the blame onto the LTTE as the main perpetrator of the conflict. While I am no expert on matters of conflict in the country, it is common knowledge, even to an outsider like me, that the ethnic conflict would not have come to the present stage without the full participation of the Sri Lankan state. It was the total disregard for Tamils in the country, combined with blatant discrimination and attacks that provided the context for the birth of the LTTE. The LTTE did not suddenly appear from the blue, but arose as a defensive shield to protect and advance the rights of Tamils. Surely, Coomaraswamy cannot miss this cardinal point in the whole context of the struggle.

While Coomaraswamy might have documented the state’s violation against the Tamil community, she avoided analyzing the primacy of the state’s role in the present conflict. Due to this, it appears from her speech/reply that the LTTE should be blamed for the present mess in the country.

Second, due to her in-built bias against the LTTE, for whatever reasons, Coomaraswamy writes that more Tamils had been killed by Tamils without providing the data. In other words, she is saying that the LTTE is responsible more killings than the other forces. But again, she shrewdly desists from blaming the Sri Lankan armed forces, the Sinhala thugs and the paramilitaries for the killings. Surely, Coomaraswamy should check her facts before making such a ludicrous assertion. Why she is vehemently opposed to the LTTE remains a mystery. There is no need for her to love the organization, but she should stick to her facts and not engage in some imaginative assertions and half-truths.

Third, I respect Coomaraswamy ’s firm belief in non-violence. But in the context of the ethnic conflict, she seems to argue as though the Tamil leadership had a choice, but eventually opted to select the violent path. Here again she tries to argue from abstraction without considering the larger and more complex dynamics of the conflict and the involvement of multiple parties. Historically, Tamils, being the aggrieved party, sought to follow the path of non-violence, but such a faith was shattered by successive governments in Sri Lanka. In the end, the survival of the Tamil community required not passive acceptance of destruction, but defensive action. No other Tamil groups provided this other than the LTTE. I don’t think that the LTTE wants violence; a non-violent path to solution would also require the consent of the Sri Lankan state. Violence is not the sole monopoly or preserve of the LTTE.

Fourth, while Coomaraswamy tends to be bit hard on the Tamil community, she is quite sympathetic to the Sinhalese community. She laments the fact that Tamils did not take the initiative to build alliances and partnerships with Sinhalese friends. Rather Tamils “played to their ideological nightmares thus accentuating the situation.” This is, in my mind, the most preposterous remark in her speech and reply. While she puts the blame on the Tamil community for not building relationships with Sinhalese, she is not ready or prepared to blame the Sinhalese or past governments.

I am not sure why Coomaraswamy decided to embark on this one-sided affair. The history of the country and - more so - the history of the Sinhalese-Tamil relationship is testimony to the many efforts taken by moderate Tamil parties to resolve the ethnic issue. But the emergence of a moderate framework has had its limits. Moderation and the adherence to Gandhian principles by Tamil political parties could not proceed anywhere because of the entrenched Sinhala-Buddhist opposition to Tamils. In the end, Tamils were subjected to the worst forms of violence in the country.

It would have been more appropriate for Coomaraswamy to ask the Sinhalese why they have failed to establish and maintain relationship with the Tamil moderate organizations.

Coomaraswamy’s speech and her reply are highly objectionable to the concerns, sentiments and well-being of Tamils in the country. Despite occupying a highly responsible international position, her remarks can be interpreted as an insult to the Tamil community, the most deprived segment of the population on the island. She does not have to support the national liberation movement, but Tamils, especially those who suffered the racist policies of the Sri Lankan state, expect some sympathy from her.

I hope Coomaraswamy will stop insulting Tamils and use her high office to do something useful for the community in the future.

Publication date: February 18, 2006

View a printer-friendly version of this article

E-mail this article to a friend

Discuss this article (2 posts)

© 1996-2007 Ilankai Tamil Sangam, USA, Inc.

ஐ.நா.வின் விசேட பிரதிநிதியாக மீண்டும் ராதிகா குமாரசுவாமி

சிறுவர்கள், ஆயுத மோதல்கள் தொடர்பான ஐ.நா.வின் விசேட பிரதிநிதியாக கலாநிதி ராதிகா குமார சுவாமி மீண்டும் நியமிக்கப்பட்டுள்ளார்.

2006 இல் முன்னாள் செயலாளர் நாயகம் கொபி அனான் இந்தப் பதவிக்கு ராதிகாவை நியமித்திருந்தார். தற்போதைய செயலாளர் நாயகம் பான் கி மூன் மீண்டும் அந்தப் பதவியை ராதிகாவுக்கு வழங்கியுள்ளார்.

சட்ட வல்லுநரான ராதிகா குமாரசுவாமி, இலங்கை மனித உரிமை ஆணைக்குழுவின் தலைவராகப் பணியாற்றியவர். சர்வதேச புகழ்பெற்ற மனித உரிமைகள் ஆலோசகரான இவர் பெண்களுக்கு எதிரான வன்முறைகள் தொடர்பான ஐ.நா.வின் விசேட அறிக்கையாளராக பணிபுரிந்தவர். குடும்ப வன்முறைகள், சமூக வன்முறைகள், பெண்களுக்கு எதிரான வன்முறைகள் பற்றியும் அவர் எழுதியுள்ளார்.

அமெரிக்க சட்டத்தரணிகள் சங்கத்தின் சர்வதேச சட்ட விருது உட்பட மனித உரிமைகள் விவகாரங்களை சிறப்பாகக் கையாண்டதற்காக சர்வதேச விருதுகள் பலவற்றைப் பெற்றவர் ராதிகா. 2005 இல் அவரின் சேவையைப் பாராட்டி `தேசமான்ய' விருதை முன்னாள் ஜனாதிபதி சந்திரிகா குமாரதுங்க வழங்கினார்.

http://www.thinakkural.com/news/2007/2/11/...s_page21155.htm

சிங்களவாதத்துக்கு செருப்புக் காவிய புண்ணியம், தேடித்தந்த பதவி அல்லவா, ராதிகா குமாரசுவாமி அம்மா.

எனவே உன்பதவி பேசினால், அது சாதாரண சிங்களவனுக்கு இருக்க வேண்டிய இனவெறியைவிட மேலாக இருந்தால்த்தானே அங்கே விசுவாசம் இன்னும் குடியிருக்கிறது என்று அர்த்தம்.

சாகக் கிடப்பவனின் மடியைக் காலிசெய்யத்துடிக்கும் கேவலப் பிழைப்புக்கள்,

பதவிகளுக்கு படுக்கைகள் செலவு செய்யும் அவமானங்கள்.

கேவலங்கள் விற்று மவுசாய் வாழும் அசிங்கங்கள்.

என்ன மாப்பிளை இப்படி பயபடுதுறிங்க, இந்த படங்களாஇயெல்லாம் போட்டு?,சின்னபிள்ளைகள் பார்த்து வெருள போகுதுகள்..

சிலுக்கு சிங்காரியின்(ராதிகா குமாரசாமி) சில்மிஷ கூச்சல்களை தேச விடுதலைப் போராட்டத்துடன் இணைத்து தயவு செய்து கொச்சப்படுத்தவேண்டாம்.

செமக்கட்டையா இருக்கு ஓய் ஆதி என்ன அசடு வழியிது

யோ கு.சா நீர் ஆள் வலு கெட்டிக்காறன் தானப்பா ....

;) ;) ;)

எல்லாம் இருக்கட்டும் எங்கை நம்மட சாத்துவை இந்தப்பக்கம் கானேல்லை

லக்ஸ்மன் கதிர்காமருக்கு பெண்வேடமிட்டது போல் முகச்சாயல் கொண்டுள்ள இவருக்கும் கதிர்காமரிற்கும் உள்ள தொடர்பு என்ன?

மாப்பு சொன்னதுபோலை இவட தோற்றம் ஆணுக்கு பெண் வேடம் போட்டாபோலை தான் இருக்கு. யாரப்பா இவள கட்டி அல்லல்படுகிற ஆசாமி?

Edited February 11, 200718 yr by Norwegian

அம்மணி தனது செவ்விதழ் விரித்து உண்மைகள் பேசும் காட்சிகளை, உரையாடலை கீழே பார்க்கலாம். உளவு நடவடிக்கைகள் செய்வது தகவல்கள் சேகரிப்பதிலும் தான் திறமை மிகுந்தவர் என்பதை அம்மணி கீழுள்ள உரையாடலில் பகிரங்கப்படுத்துகின்றார்!

அம்மணியின் செவ்வியைக் (01)கண்டு களிப்பதற்கு இங்கே அழுத்தவும்

அம்மணியின் செவ்வியைக் (02)கண்டு களிப்பதற்கு இங்கே அழுத்தவும்

அம்மணியின் செவ்வியைக் (03)கண்டு களிப்பதற்கு இங்கே அழுத்தவும்

Transcript:

Resolution 1612 and the Security Council

I am Radhika Coomaraswamy, Under-Secretary-General and Special Representative of the Secretary-General for Children and Armed Conflict with the United Nations. My background is as a lawyer in human rights, and I was formerly the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence against Women and also Chair of the Sri Lankan Human Rights Commission.

At a direct level, in the sense that the monitoring mechanism feeds directly into the Security Council Working Group, and to the Secretary-General especially, we hope that the Security Council, once it sees repeat offenders and other kinds of violations, will take necessary action. They have said, in their resolution, that they will take action, including targeted sanctions against individuals who are repeat offenders. So that is the direct result of the monitoring and reporting. It is meant to go to the Security Council, and the Security Council has committed itself to take action against parties.

What are the positive results? Well, I think when you do take action such as targeted sanctions, etc., or if you “name and shame” as the Security Council lists do... then there is the issue of combatting impunity, which is very important... I think there is a sense that people in many parts of the world do terrible things, and nothing is done to hold them accountable, so this is fighting that kind of impunity. And maybe deterrence. I think, to some extent, some strong action taken by the ICC [international Criminal Court] and others has to some extent had some deterrent effect on this issue.

International Cooperation

I think there are two kinds of things that international civil society needs to do. One is at the local level: the need to gather verifiable, excellent information. And the other is at the international level in New York: to deal with the Security Council, lobbying governments to take action. Both kinds of action are needed.

Resolution 1612 is a monitoring mechanism. It’s the theory of deterrence really, and fighting impunity. You feel that if action is taken, people will feel that action is being taken, and therefore they will think twice before they engage in this kind of activity. If action is not taken, there is impunity, and people don’t comply. We must recognize that 1612 is a very unique and exciting development in the history of the Security Council, and that therefore it’s very necessary that we do it right. Because the worst thing that could happen is that the Security Council gets engaged in these social issues, gets engaged in moral issues, and then it fails. That would be a disaster. So it’s very important that we all work together to make it a success.

Prevent, monitor and punish

The biggest challenge, of course, is getting information—how to get objective, verifiable information on these issues that is absolutely accurate, so that no one can question it. Of course, in war zones it is difficult to use the traditional ways of gathering information because it is extremely insecure. People are frightened to give information, to speak out. I find that NGOs who work in the field—especially operational partners, who work closely with people—are custodians of a lot of information. And so how do we get that information while protecting their work, to make sure that we don’t hinder their ability to work in the humanitarian field? So that’s the greatest challenge I think, getting information.

There are three types of things we have to do. We have to prevent, then we have to monitor and punish those who do those types of things, and third we have to help reintegrate the children themselves. Now the second part is being done already, with this monitoring mechanism and the ICC. What the international community can do now is the first and third, and that requires putting a lot of resources into wartorn areas. First, mediating peaceful solutions is one thing, but also we found, for example, where I was recently in northern Uganda, you get children coming out of being abducted, then they are brought into and they live in these terrible camps. And they have no alternative livelihoods; schools are not functioning. So then they just become criminal gangs, or they join the government military—the only thing they can do is fight because they were child soldiers once. So the need to deal with the whole issue—reintegration, development of those areas, providing alternative lifestyles for the children that have been affected—I think that’s the commitment needed. And it’s very difficult, because people don’t like to invest in war zones, to give resources to war zones. But it’s a vicious cycle, because the less resources, the more children are susceptible and vulnerable to being abused.

ராதிகா குமாரசாமியின் தொழில் செய்யும் நேர்மையைப் பற்றி(கபட முகத்தைப் பற்றி)கீழுள்ள கட்டுரை இவ்வாறு விபரிக்கின்றது:

International Safety net and the United Nations

Source: TCHR/CTDH

Ref : JK105/PR/2006

25 July 2006

Recent reports say that there are 50 conflicts raging in the world. Many of these conflicts arose due to extreme oppression of peoples and their subsequent legitimate demand for the right to self-determination. In most of these situations armed struggle continues to be used to achieve this collective right.

When we look at the Tamils? struggle in exercise of the right to self-determination, we can clearly see it as an armed struggle. However, what is neither realised nor visible to many is that the Tamils decided to start an armed struggle, only after the failure of thirty-five years of non-violent struggle. One of the two parties to the conflict, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) was born only in the 70s and the actual armed struggle began only in 1983, soon after the Tamil holocaust of which the international community was well aware. While the victims, Tamils around the world, mark the 23rd anniversary of those horrific atrocities, it is appropriate to reflect on the developments of the bloody ethnic conflict in the island.

What was the reaction of the international community to the Tamil holocaust in July 83? It is sad to say that no pressure was exerted on Sri Lanka either to stop the ongoing genocide of Tamils or to find a durable solution to the conflict. If the international community had looked into the root causes of the problems, rather than helping the state terrorism in Sri Lanka, the island?s history and situation today would have been very different.

Also, due to heavy lobbying by the Sri Lanka government, the United Nations failed to bring any strong resolution against Sri Lanka. By contrast, Sri Lanka is being given full military help by the international community. None of the Singhalese leaders were ready to accept any foreign involvement in the conflict, insisting that it is an ?internal? matter. But after two decades of bloody conflict, loss of more than seventy thousand lives, economic and cultural devastation to the Tamil people, the Sri Lankan government was compelled to accept third party mediation. Whether the ceasefire agreement, signed in February 2002, under the facilitation of the Royal Norwegian government, between the LTTE and government of Sri Lanka was entirely effective or not ? it has been acknowledged by the international community that the ethnic conflict in the island of Sri Lanka is no more an internal matter as it was claimed by many Singhalese leaders. Still, some including President Mahinda Rajapaksa, maintain the same position that this is an ?internal? matter.

For known or unknown reasons, some countries may hold biased positions regarding this conflict. However, this does not mean that the morale, the confidence and the determination of the Tamil people - survivors of the Tamil holocaust, twenty years of bloody conflict and other destructive measures, - have been eroded.

Even though the international community has turned a blind eye to the July 83 holocaust and the continuing genocide, the Tamils have worked hard to build up their nation. With all the ups and downs, today the whole world is witnessing a de-facto government with appropriate infrastructure in place in the Tamil homeland, the North East. The failure of the Sri Lankan government to treat the Tamil people as equals, the economic embargo and deliberate military attacks by Air, Sea, and Land on the population in the North East made them even more courageous, despite great loss of life, limb and economy.

The government of Sri Lanka is spending massive amounts of energy and time in promoting the banning of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and in purchasing arms for the impending war; whereas it fails to spend a single minute in finding a negotiated settlement to the island?s long-standing bloody conflict. The government of Sri Lanka disseminates propaganda, denying the realities in the North East, but it is a fact that those who support the LTTE win elections with a huge majority. Here one should not hide the fact that the LTTE is a party to the present ceasefire agreement.

In the United Nations, there are one hundred and ninety one member states. If one argues that thirty countries disagree with the LTTE, that means, all other one hundred and sixty one countries endorse the LTTE.

This is where the ?international safety net? begins and alarms not only the Tamils, but also it should alarm world citizens. Reports of the UN Special Rapporteurs, treaty bodies, various International organisations, members of various Parliaments and Senates round the world cast light on strong evidence of the deteriorating human rights situation in Sri Lanka. Yes, it is true that Sri Lanka was elected to the newly formed UN Human Rights Council, but it was elected in a voting procedure which did not consider the abysmal human rights record of Sri Lanka.

In the recent past, by hook or by crook, Sri Lanka has achieved something to add to its propaganda. Now Sri Lanka is directing its energy towards the United Nations, as a target, to be included in their well-planned ?international safety net?. In the recent past, a few personalities selected by the government of Sri Lanka, have already got significant positions in the United Nations, on the pretext of international civil service. The international community, which is not at all aware of this master plan of the Sri Lankan government, innocently endorses these appointments.

Some selected personalities known for these assignments are : Jayantha Dhanapla, Radhika Coomaraswamy, IGP Chandra Fernando, Devinda R. Subasinghe, Palitha Kohonna, Depika Udugama and many others.

Mr. Jayantha Dhanapala is the key person seeking the post of Secretary General of the United Nations. Being a Sri Lankan diplomat, he justifies the Sri Lankan atrocities against the Tamil people within many World bodies and institutions, especially in Geneva and New York. A huge amount of Sri Lankan tax payers' money is being used by the Sri Lanka embassy in the United States for his propaganda work. Below we give an excerpt from Jayantha Dhanapala?s Congressional briefing, for the world citizen to understand, what would happen in Sri Lanka, if Dhanapala is appointed as the UN Secretary General.

?....................... Indeed it is the international safety net provided by such a sanctions based approach that has allowed the Government of Sri Lanka (GOSL) to continue to negotiate with the LTTE to find a peaceful solution to the armed conflict in Sri Lanka. In order for the GOSL to be able to talk to the LTTE without further alienating the peace constituency in Sri Lanka, the international community must take a tough stand against them. This will help move the peace process forward.? (Congressional briefing by Jayantha Dhanapala, Secretary General of the Secretariat for Coordinating the Peace Process (SCOPP-Sri Lanka) and Senior Adviser to the President of Sri Lanka. 8th September 2005)

Is it possible for Jayantha Dhanapala to explain to the world citizen, why the peace negotiations never moved even an inch while he was the head of the SCOPP for two and half years?

Madam Radhika Coomaraswamy who was the Special Rapporteur on violence against women from 1994 - July 2003, was appointed as Special Representative for Children affected by Armed Conflict in April 2006. She would not have got this position without the initiative and the help of the Sri Lanka government. It was well known that she was in the good books of President Mahinda Rajapaksa.

During the period when Radhika Coomaraswamy was Special Rapporteur on violence against women (1994-July 2003), 4300 documented cases of Tamil women were reported in the North East. Tamil women were brutally raped and many were even killed by the Sri Lankan security forces. Let Radhika explain to the world citizen, how many of these cases have been processed by her while she was in this UN post.

When Radhika Coomaraswamy was asked questions in UN parallel public meetings in Geneva by members of civil society, such as ?why (is she) not covering any cases of the Tamil women who were raped and killed by the Sri Lanka soldiers? , her standard reply was that she, herself, being a person from Sri Lanka, was unable to take up those cases. This is in contradiction to the work of other Special Rapporteurs who cover the violations of their own country as well.

During the same period Radhika never hesitated to go out of her mandate to speak about the LTTE, accusing them of alleged killings in Sri Lanka. The UN records will stand by this fact.

During the same period there was an economic embargo imposed on the North East by the Sri Lanka government, severely affecting hundreds of thousands of children. Radhika, being a UN Special Rapporteur, being a Tamil mother, never uttered a word about the hardship that those Tamil children underwent.

While she was the Chairperson of the Sri Lankan Human Rights Commission (SLHRC), the Human Rights Commission never bothered about the genocide that was carried out by the Sri Lankan security forces. Being the Chairperson, she sent a fact finding mission to the Eastern province, where there were horrendous violations by the Sri Lanka security forces - only after we in TCHR travelled all the way from Europe in August 2004 and published our findings. SLHRC?s motive was to counter the actuality in the East.

Dr. Palitha T.B. Kohona was the United Nations Chief of the Treaty Section since 1995 and only last February he joined as the Head of the Secretariat for Coordinating the Peace Process (SCOPP) of Sri Lanka.

While Kohona was the Chief of the UN Treaty Section, Secretary General Kofi Annan was refused permission to visit the areas of the island most badly affected by the Tsunami, which are in the North East. The Sri Lankan authorities deliberately prevented him from making a humanitarian visit there. This is a pure violation of the UN Charter, Chapter XV Article 100.

Is Kohona aware of this violation by a member state? Being an international civil servant, the Chief of the UN Treaty Section, what action did he take against Sri Lanka?

While he was the UN Chief of the Treaty section, he was closely liaising with member States. This introduction is more than enough, for Kohona to successfully convince them, on behalf of the Sri Lanka government, of its daily lies and exaggerations.

Mr. Chandra Fernando, Inspector General of Police is believed to be a candidate for a vacant position in the highly prestigious United Nations Human Rights Committee. It would be humiliating for this Human Rights Committee to have one of the world?s worst violators of human rights, as a member. This would be like a butcher conducting mass in a church and would be the joke of the century. Hopefully, the High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour and other members of civil society will make a note of this gamble by the government of Sri Lanka .

This month, Sri Lankan diplomat, Devinda R. Subasinghe has been appointed as President of a Washington-based organisation, ?Bridging Nations?. This collaborates with premier think tanks, universities, and policy-making bodies to create innovative actionable agendas. Subasinghe worked as an adviser for the U.S. government from 1995 through 1999 on foreign policy, economic development and public and private corporations. As Ambassador to the United States, he was instrumental in strengthening Sri Lanka's working relationship with the White House, Congress, the private sector and various other government agencies by addressing diplomatic, security and trade matters.

There are many others also waiting for various top jobs in UN institutions.

The Sri Lankan political leaders whose speeches are dominated by persistent mention of the ?Sovereignty? of their country, are for the ?international safety net?. This safety net is neither to prevent human rights violations nor to bring about a solution to the conflict. It is calculated purely to suppress a nation, an ethnic group or people who are demanding their right to self determination.

Below, we quote Ranil Wickremasinghe speaking in Parliament in May 2003.

?............................. As I have said before, the safety-net of the international community which we have brought about is being of great help to us at this time. We have had a firm _expression of views by our friendly countries, including the United States, UK, Japan, France and India. (Prime Minister Ranil Wickremasinghe?s statement to Parliament on 6 May 2003)

Since the independence (1948) of this island, there have been 13 Prime Ministers and 5 Presidents. As far as the ethnic conflict or the right to self-determination of the Tamils? are concerned, there has never been a change of policy by the governments of Sri Lanka. Everything has been done to suppress a nation of people who were struggling for their rights through non violent methods and other means. As the Sri Lankan state has failed to crush the people, it is now establishing an international ?safety? net.

The international community should be alert and should react to this cheating business of the Sri Lanka government. Successive Sri Lankan governments have done everything under the sun and enjoyinternational impunity. This is scandalous and cannot be justified.

The people of the North East have their historical claim, refusing to allow their culture to be obliterated, and their, legitimate right to self-determination to be trampled upon.

HEAD OFFICE:

Tamil Centre for Human Rights - TCHR/CTDH

9, rue des Peupliers - 95140 Garge les Gonesse - FRANCE

Contact person : S. V. Kirubaharan ? General Secretary

Tel/Fax: + 33 1 42 67 54 36 - Email: tchrgs@hotmail.com / tchgs@tchr.net

TCHR-UK

Tamil Centre for Human Rights - TCHR/CTDH

PO Box 182, Manchester M16 8ED, UNITED KINGDOM

Contact person : Deirdre McConnell ? Director International Programme

Fax: + 44 161 860 4609 - Email: tchrdip@hotmail.com / tchrdip@tchr.net

TCHR-NETHERLANDS

Tamil Centrum voor Mensenrechten- TCHR

Steelingmolen 43

1703 TE Heerhugowaard, THE NETHERLANDS

Contact person : Sinniah Indiran

Fax : + 31 - 72 - 57 15 801

Email : tchrholland@hotmail.com

TCHR-SWITZERLAND

Tamilen Zentrum fur Mensenrechten - TCHR

P. o. Box : 319

8172 ? Niederglatt, SWITZERLAND

Contact person : Thambirajah Genegatharan

Email : tchrswitzerland@hotmail.com

இந்த அம்மணி அந்த ஆனந்தகுமாரசுவாமியின் பேர்த்தியோ?????கொழும்பில் உள்ள ஆனந்த குமாரசுவாமி மாவத்தை அவர்களின் வாரிசா???யாரும் தெறிந்தால் விளக்கம் தருக???

இவள் சந்திரிகாவின் நகல் என நினைக்கிறேன். பார்ப்பதற்கு அலி மாதிரியும் இருக்கிறது. இவளுக்கு பசி என்றால் தெரியுமா? பட்டிணியை அனுபவித்திருப்பாளா? வெடி, குண்டோசையை கேட்டிருப்பாளா? ஒரு நிமிடமேனும் எம்மைப்போல் பதுங்கு குழியில் பதுங்கியிருப்பாளா? அல்லது ஆண் இராணுவத்தினனால் சோதனை எனும் பெயரில் உடல் முழுதும் தொடப்பட்டிருப்பாளோ? மானங்கெட்டவள்....... ஒரு தமிழிச்சியாய்/ தமிழனாய் ( அலி தானே) இருந்து கொண்டு இப்படி தமிழனை வெள்ள்ளையருக்கு முன் விக்கிறாளே/னே ! சண்டாளி அலி.

இவள் சந்திரிகாவின் நகல் என நினைக்கிறேன். பார்ப்பதற்கு அலி மாதிரியும் இருக்கிறது. இவளுக்கு பசி என்றால் தெரியுமா? பட்டிணியை அனுபவித்திருப்பாளா? வெடி, குண்டோசையை கேட்டிருப்பாளா? ஒரு நிமிடமேனும் எம்மைப்போல் பதுங்கு குழியில் பதுங்கியிருப்பாளா? அல்லது ஆண் இராணுவத்தினனால் சோதனை எனும் பெயரில் உடல் முழுதும் தொடப்பட்டிருப்பாளோ? மானங்கெட்டவள்....... ஒரு தமிழிச்சியாய்/ தமிழனாய் ( அலி தானே) இருந்து கொண்டு இப்படி தமிழனை வெள்ள்ளையருக்கு முன் விக்கிறாளே/னே ! சண்டாளி அலி.

இவர் லக்ஸ்மன் கதிர்காமர், நீலன் திருச்செல்வம், ரட்ண ஜீவன் கூல் போன்ற படித்த முட்டாள்களில் ஒருவர் என்பதே நான் இதுவரை இவரைப் பற்றிச் செய்த ஆராய்ச்சிகளின் முடிவு. தானாகத் திருந்தினால் உண்டு. மற்றும்படி இந்த முட்டாள்களை நாம் ஒருபொழுதும் திருத்திவிட முடியாது. ஆனால் கண்ணில் எண்ணையை ஊற்றிக் கொண்டு இந்த முட்டாள்கள் பற்றி நாம் எப்பொழுதும் விழிப்புடன் எச்சரிக்கையாக இருக்க வேண்டும். இல்லாவிடின் எமது கோவணத்தையும் உருவிக்கொண்டு போய்விடுவார்கள்!

சிரிச்சி சிரிச்சு வந்தா சினா தனா டோய் சிலுக்கி

சிரிச்சி சிரிச்சு வந்தா சினா தனா டோய் சிலுக்கி

சிரிச்சி சிரிச்சு வந்தா சினா தனா டோய் சிலுக்கி

ய.நா சபைக்காரங்களையும் மயக்கப்போட்டலோ ?

அது சரி எல்லாரும் கதிர்காமரோட ஓப்பிடுறியள் சரிதான் நான் கொஞ்சம் வித்தியாசமாய் யோசிக்கிறன்

கதிர்காமர் - கருப்பா பயங்கரமான இருந்தான்

ராதிகா - பயங்கரமா கருப்பாய இருக்கிறாள்

இவள் நிச்சயாமாளக ஓரு தமிழ் பெண்ணுக்கோ அல்லது மானமுள்ள தமிழ் ஆணுக்கோ பிறந்திருக்கமாட்டாள் பபபபபபபலலலலலலலலல NNNNNபேபபபபபப ருருருருருருருருரு

செமக்கட்டையா இருக்கு ஓய் ஆதி என்ன அசடு வழியிது

;) ;) ;)

ஓய் சின்னாப்ஸ்...

என்ன ஆதி இவ்வளவு மட்டமா?

பொம்பிளையள் இலச்சணம் அதுவும் தமிழ் பெண்களின் எழிலை, இயல்பை, சீற்றத்தை எல்லாம் ஆதி இரசிப்பன் விளங்கிச்சோ....

ஆக்..... தூ..தூ.... ஆதி என்ன ..... அதுவா? :angry:

ஓய் சின்னாப்ஸ்...

என்ன ஆதி இவ்வளவு மட்டமா?

பொம்பிளையள் இலச்சணம் அதுவும் தமிழ் பெண்களின் எழிலை, இயல்பை, சீற்றத்தை எல்லாம் ஆதி இரசிப்பன் விளங்கிச்சோ....

ஆக்..... தூ..தூ.... ஆதி என்ன ..... அதுவா? :angry:

அட்ரா அட்ரா

யார் இந்த ராதிகா குமாரசாமி?

சிறீ லங்கா அரசாங்கத்தின் கைக்கூலியாக சென்று 2006 ஏப்ரல் முதல் ஐக்கிய நாடுகள் சபையில் பணிபுரியும் இந்த ராதிகா குமாரசாமி என்பவர் யார்? அண்மையில் விடுதலைப் புலிகளிற்கெதிராக பொருளாதாரத் தடைகள் விதிக்கப்படவேண்டும் என முழக்கம் இட்டுள்ள அம்மணிக்கு சிறீ லங்கா அரசாங்கத்தினால் கொடுக்கப்பட்டுள்ள வேலைத் திட்டங்கள் எவை? இவர் ஒரு தமிழரா? அல்லது தமிழச்சி போல் வேடமிட்டுள்ள ஒரு சிங்களவரா? அம்மணியால் தமிழில் உரையாட முடியமா? இவருக்கு சமாதானத்திற்கான நோபல் பரிசு 2007 ம் ஆண்டில் கிடைப்பதற்கு வாய்ப்பிருக்கின்றதா? லக்ஸ்மன் கதிர்காமருக்கு பெண்வேடமிட்டது போல் முகச்சாயல் கொண்டுள்ள இவருக்கும் கதிர்காமரிற்கும் உள்ள தொடர்பு என்ன?

யாழ் கள நண்பர்களே அம்மணி பற்றி உங்களிற்குத் தெரிந்த விடயங்களை இங்கே பகிர்ந்து ராதிகா குமாரசாமியின் உண்மை முகத்தைக் கண்டறிவதற்கு உதவிபுரியுங்கள்!

KUGATHASAN